Journal of Counselor Preparation and Supervision
Author ORCID Identifier
0000-0002-6784-2910
Document Type
Empirical Research Article
Keywords
gatekeeping, counselor competencies, counselor training programs, core faculty, adjunct faculty, CCS-R, evaluating students, CACREP
Subject Area
Clinical Supervision, Counseling, Counselor Education
Abstract
This study examines the differences in how adjunct and core faculty evaluate counseling students using a brief version of the Counselor Competencies Scale-Revised (CCS-R). Data from 647 evaluations of 433 students were analyzed. The results show that adjunct faculty, particularly those with master's degrees, tend to rate students significantly higher on professional counseling dispositions than core faculty, raising concerns about the consistency of gatekeeping in counselor training programs. These findings suggest a need for the standardization of counseling disposition evaluation practices to maintain high training standards. Implications for student-to-faculty ratio requirements are discussed.
Public Significance Statement
This study demonstrates that faculty status (core or adjunct) and level of educational attainment are significantly related to the scores that the faculty render on counseling student evaluations.
DOI
https://doi.org/10.70013/p8mqfc0y
Recommended Citation
Newmeyer, M. D., Stafford, K. C., Buckingham, P. J., Fischer, K. E., McDaniel, M. D., & Wilson, R. P. (2025). Evaluating competencies in counseling students: Comparing adjunct and core faculty ratings. Journal of Counselor Preparation and Supervision, 19(4), 1-17.
